What happens to a phased attack eventually due to FARP limitations?

In the context of aviation tactics, particularly concerning Forward Arming and Refueling Points (FARPs), a phased attack is designed to ensure that aviation units can sustain operations while maximizing their combat effectiveness. However, the limitations of FARPs, such as available fuel, ammunition, and logistical support, can lead to a necessity for continuous operations.

When a phased attack operates under FARP constraints, it ultimately evolves into a continuous attack to maintain momentum and operational tempo. This is crucial because it allows for continuous engagement with the enemy, ensuring that pressure is sustained and combat capabilities are effectively utilized without significant pauses that could provide the enemy with opportunities to regroup or counterattack.

In contrast, other options do not accurately reflect the dynamics of how phased attacks interact with FARP limitations. These limitations do not typically result in a retreat strategy or render the operation ineffective; rather, they compel forces to adapt until they can obtain the necessary resupply. The requirement for external support is also not a direct consequence of FARP limitations but rather a broader operational consideration that can influence multiple mission types. Thus, reverting to a continuous attack is the correct outcome of FARP limitations in a phased attack scenario.