What separates 'Positive' command and control from 'Procedural' methods?

The distinction between 'Positive' command and control and 'Procedural' methods lies primarily in the degree of interaction and communication involved in the operational process. 'Positive' command and control emphasizes direct communication and adaptability in decision-making. This allows for real-time adjustments based on the dynamic nature of the battlefield or operational environment. Leaders can exercise initiative and take immediate action, responding effectively to changing conditions as they arise.

In contrast, 'Procedural' methods focus on following established orders and Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs). While this approach can enhance consistency and predictability in operations, it may limit flexibility and responsiveness to real-time developments. The structured nature of procedural methods means that actions are often pre-defined, which can lead to delays in response or missed opportunities due to a lack of direct communication and situational awareness.

This contrast is crucial for army operations, where the ability to adapt and communicate effectively can determine the success of missions. Understanding this separation helps military leaders choose the appropriate command and control style based on the operational context.